Back to the live storefront · Get Audit — $39

Public Website Technical Audit

Subject: https://www.wikipedia.org/
Prepared by: The Criners LLC
Method: passive public-page review (browser fetch of the public homepage and response headers)
Price of this service: $39
This sample was not paid for by the site owner.

Executive summary

Wikipedia.org’s language-portal homepage is a fast, recognizable public gateway. HTTPS and HSTS are in good shape, a search field is present, and page landmarks exist. The highest-value presentation fixes on this public page are a complete mobile viewport, a more descriptive document title, and a self-canonical URL. None of the findings below are security exploits. Login, editing, and account flows were not tested.

What was reviewed

Public HTML of https://www.wikipedia.org/ retrieved over HTTPS.
Document title, language, headings, landmarks, search form, and a sample of public copy.
Selected public response headers: transport security, caching, content-type.

Not reviewed: logged-in Wikipedia, VisualEditor, donations checkout beyond the public page, mobile apps, APIs, or any non-public surface.

1. Viewport is incomplete — importance: high

Evidence: The live homepage includes <meta name="viewport" content="initial-scale=1,user-scalable=yes">. It does not set width=device-width.

Why it matters: Mobile browsers use that hint to size layout. Omitting device-width can cause unexpected scaling on phones even when the design is otherwise responsive.

Recommendation: Use a standard viewport such as width=device-width, initial-scale=1. Keep user scaling enabled unless there is a documented accessibility reason not to.

2. Document title is brand-only — importance: medium

Evidence: <title>Wikipedia</title>. The visible H1 text is “Wikipedia / The Free Encyclopedia”.

Why it matters: Browser tabs and many search snippets use the title. The H1 already states the outcome; the title does not.

Recommendation: Align title with the H1, for example “Wikipedia — The Free Encyclopedia”, unless there is a known search-console reason to keep the short brand title.

3. No canonical tag on the portal — importance: low

Evidence: The retrieved HTML had no rel="canonical".

Why it matters: wikipedia.org is not an undiscovered site. A self-canonical still reduces ambiguity between www, language portals, and protocol variants.

Recommendation: Add <link rel="canonical" href="https://www.wikipedia.org/"> on this portal page.

4. JSON-LD is absent on this portal page — importance: low

Evidence: No application/ld+json block was present in the public HTML reviewed.

Why it matters: Structured data is optional here; the page is a language gateway, not an article. If rich results for the organization are desired, the portal is a reasonable place for Organization/WebSite JSON-LD.

Recommendation: Only add JSON-LD if there is a specific search appearance to support. Do not add it for decoration.

5. Transport security is strong — importance: positive finding

Evidence: The URL is HTTPS. Response headers included strict-transport-security: max-age=106384710; includeSubDomains; preload.

Why it matters: Visitors are steered onto HTTPS. This is the correct public posture.

Recommendation: Keep HSTS as-is. No change required for this finding.

6. Search and landmarks are present — importance: positive finding

Evidence: The page exposes <main>, <nav>, <footer>, a skip link, one H1, a search <form> with type="search", and a large language list (central-featured-lang appears 23 times in the public HTML).

Why it matters: A first-time visitor can search or pick a language without hunting. That matches the portal’s job.

Recommendation: Preserve the search-first layout. If the language grid is dense on small screens, confirm the featured-language list remains usable at a 375px width; this review did not run a device lab.

Recommendations in order

Add width=device-width to the viewport meta tag.
Make the document title describe the product, not only the brand.
Add a self-canonical URL on the portal.
Leave HSTS, HTTPS, search, and landmarks as they are unless product goals change.

Limitations

Passive public review only. No vulnerability scanning, exploitation, brute force, login testing, credential use, or private-data access. Headers and HTML can vary by cache, geography, and A/B testing. This sample is not a statement that Wikipedia is a customer of The Criners LLC.

Get Audit — $39

Checkout is hosted by Stripe. Submit the public URL you want reviewed.